Scott Fillmer Website Gradient

Examining Christianity’s Stance on Same-Sex Relationships

Update (Disclaimer) 15 years later in 2025: This is an old post, written almost 15 years ago, but it links to another post which is of higher value to me, Are There Different Degrees of Sin? The Greater Sin of John 19:11 , so I chose to keep this post active. If you are coming here today, my posts now generally stay away from politics and almost completely concentrate on photography. For me this debate belongs in 2010 and I really have no interest in it today as I did back then.

Contrary to what the world says, views change and mature, and people do have the ability to evaluate their own heart. While I did write the post below in 2010, I would say looking back at my 2010 self, my heart has changed, in general, and a lot of what I wrote I would not write today (mainly because I loath politics and divisive topics now).

I have witnessed other people of faith be theologically correct while at the same time be very judgmental, harsh, and unloving, and that is not who I am or who I want to be today. Timothy calls for patience in 2 Timothy 4:2, and I think loving others through being very patient better describes what I write today.

2 Timothy 4:2 …be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. (ESV)

The links below are almost all broken links now, but I have kept the links the way they were in 2010 just to preserve where they pointed at the time.

Original Text on Prop 8

California’s “Prop 8” proves that same-sex relationships are acceptable to Christians and compatible with scripture. Of course this is utter ridiculousness, but, that severely flawed logic seems to be what is prevailing in our culture today. This topic, which I usually just tend to leave alone, is overpowering the news, blogs, and culture lately (and is certainly nothing new under the sun, gay’s have been trying to justify their actions for millennia, see Why is Being Gay a Sin? for a civil discussion, Does Romans 1:26 Condemn Lesbians? for the absurd justification, and then an honest “Christian Perspective”, not forgetting to throw in Anne Rice who recently “quit” Christianity on Facebook [comments in pdf,] with Mark Driscoll’s response for the Washington Post, because she didn’t want to be “anti-gay anymore”, and the countless trash talk about Proposition 8 in California).

With Proposition 8 being overturned by the California courts, this seems destined for the Supreme Court (where they probably don’t want to deal with it either). The Boston Globe did a huge photo spread called Same Sex Marriage about a week ago and the responses to that article show why this, unfortunately, is THE topic of our day for Christians and the church.  This discussion really wasn’t intended to launch into whether being gay is a sin or not, but to show the absurd arguments on both sides, which lack any careful thought.

This comment below is typical when reading trash talk on the news sites, and was made by someone who used the title “I Feel Drawn Towards Christianity, But I’m Gay”, which then received very complimentary responses, with little question for the lifestyle itself, or with sound argument for or against Christians and the homosexual lifestyle, and what scripture has to say about it’s effects and consequences.

I was surprised in a few ways, one by how openly acceptable the Christian responses were to this person.  Not that they were accepting of the person, that’s great, but accepting of all aspects of the persons lifestyle, with not much need for contemplation (although some did suggest the person generically seek God’s direction). The other surprise was how utterly weak the reasoning and arguments were that were used on both sides.

I am certainly no expert on this topic whatsoever, and there are many who can soundly argue, on both sides, but those seem to be few and far between.  No gay person I talk to (and many Christians for that matter) can give a sound theological argument, backed and based on scripture (since this person “feels drawn to Christianity”).  The majority of the arguments put forth are emotional arguments, which are impossible to argue against in a rational manner.  This is the argument that was given in this particular case:

The Bible also condemns divorce, the eating of pork and shrimp, and says that men shouldn’t sit on the same chairs as women who are menstruating.

The argument seems to lack even a surface level study of scripture, but most Christians responded with nothing other than an emotional response.  As with much of Scripture in our culture today, these verses are taken so much out of context for the use of the argument for a homosexual lifestyle I am surprised they were made? I am not being mean or hateful in spirit here, but seriously, if you are gay, this is your argument?

  • The Bible condemns the eating of pork.
  • We eat pork today.
  • Therefore, homosexuality is ok in the sight of the Lord.

There are so many things that could be addressed but at the basic level, in Mark 7:18-19 Jesus declared all foods to be clean, he didn’t declare all forms of sex to be clean. A better argument that perhaps shows a little more clearly why scripture says that the homosexual lifestyle is sinful in God’s eyes (and there are many things that are actually still seen as sinful in God’s eyes today, besides homosexuality), would be:

Point 1 on Sin:

  • The Bible says sin is detestable in God’s eye’s.
  • Therefore any continuous sinful act is not honoring to God.

Point 2 on Marriage:

  • The Bible defines sex outside of marriage as sin.
  • The Bible defines marriage as a monogamous union between a man and a woman.
  • Therefore any nonrepentant sexual relationship of any kind outside marriage is sin in God’s eyes.
  • Therefore a nonrepentant homosexual lifestyle is sin.
  • Therefore a nonrepentant adulterous relationship is sin.
  • Therefore any sexual relationship before marriage is sin.

I rarely see those “hateful” Christians everyone seems to refer to today that will acknowledge that the last three are equally sin, and equally condemned by scripture, but, that doesn’t mean that either is less or more acceptable to God as a way to live that honor’s God. I do not say that in a hateful manner but in an examination of scripture.  I also recognize that many, or most, “gay Christians” will take issues with my argument above and defend it away in some manner.  The statements above are all based on scripture and can all be backed theologically with sound argument.

Our culture as a whole is continually refusing to see objective truths in the Bible today. Whether we like to ignore them in our day or not, they still exist, there are still things that God says are good, and those things God says are bad, we just seem to have so much knowledge in everything that we have no knowledge in the actual truth anymore.

Thanks for Visiting!

My aim is to shareย useful, ad-free content without clutter or sales noise. Support an ongoing ad-free experience with my tip jar, on my shop, or subscribe for free to my email list. I only send updates when new content is published! Sometimes I also use affiliate links. Did you like this article? Comment below, orย send a private message here.


61 responses to “Examining Christianity’s Stance on Same-Sex Relationships”

  1. John,

    I think this has come to a head here: I have to be completely honest; your “argument” is baseless, mostly irrelevant, and out of context (Biblically speaking).

    I’m happy you recited Col. 1:21, “Once you were alienated from God and were enemies in your minds because of your evil behavior,” because that was my point, period. Christians, or at least people who claim to be, cannot live contrary to God’s intended purpose and will, and (falsely) “believe” they are filled with the Holy Spirit. God did not allow homosexuality, fornication, or idolatry in the OT, and Jesus, and the Holy Spirit (co-author of NT) do not condone it in the NT. They are One, not separate. The message is the Word (Jesus Christ, Jn 1:1). The Word is immutable.

    I’m not sure why you are hung up on the second commandment, as if that saves you. The second commandment is applied to a believer’s life, “after” he/she adheres to the Gospel. I think you have the Gospel confused with a one time deal, as if the Gospel only applies to salvation and not life, and glorification. We live the Gospel, it is not ours, but belongs to Christ. The Gospel is not a thing.
    The Holy Spirit warned “believers” that if they wanted to remain in their old lifestyles, then they would have no place in the kingdom (via Paul, Gal. 5:19-21). Thats the end of the story.
    I’m really confused by an entire argument basing salvation on love. Love is a by-product, not salvation. I only “know” love “because” He illuminated me, of love. This whole “godlove” theory is un-Biblical. I don’t mean to sound condescending, but out of all love and faithfulness to the One who called me, if you’re in a homosexual relationship now, God may give you up to your reprobate mind, take that as a warning, and one out of love. God disciplines through love, but His loving discipline may include suffering and severe conviction. If He didn’t love you, then He wouldn’t have warned us to abolish the old habits of sexual immorality, drunkenness, idolatry. Homosexuality is idolatry; in that it worships the created more than the Creator, that is what Paul says in Rom. 1.
    I’m sorry, but if you continue with the “godlove” theory, I really have no idea what you are talking about and would love to see the Biblical texts (in context) where you exegetically pulled it from. I have based my argument on textual context (Gal. 5:16-24; 1 Cor. 6; and Rom. 1), and even Hermeneutically. I’m not sure what else you would like me to answer, other than you are justified in love? Is that what you are seeking? I’m willing to listen, but the argument must be contextual and relevant.

  2. @john
    I am not sure what you point is to keep repeating the same thing over and over again, we all know “God is love” verses. Just because a verse in the bible, taken out of context, says “God is love” means that homosexuality are acceptable to God. In making all these comments you have actually proved my post to be correct, as much as my original point in the post when I said the other person justified a homosexual lifestyle by saying we eat pork. Your argument basically comes down to this.
    After reading all of your comments, and trying understand what you context is between God, love, and homosexuality, I can only conclude that your proposition to be:
    God is love
    Homosexuality is a form of love
    Therefore homosexuality is not a sin.
    This argument, or any variation of this argument is categorically incorrect, inaccurate, and does not follow the context of the bible taken as a whole, especially when you are not referring to a proper form of love as taken from a contextual reading of scripture. You are trying to justify a sin, it is as simple as that. I could do the same thing for any number of sins that aren’t homosexuality, but in the end, it is simply justification for something God says he hates (not loves).
    You can continue to quote scripture out of context to justify your argument, I don’t mind the conversation, I just don’t see the point as you haven’t made your point any more understandable not than it was in the beginning?

  3. god is love, everything that is of god is love.

    1 John 4:8
    Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love.

    1john4:16
    And so we know and rely on the love God has for us. God is love. Whoever lives in love lives in God, and God in him.

    the third commandment”love one another as i have loved”

    when we love in christ, thru grace, it is not our love but his love thru us.

    John 15:5
    “I am the vine; you are the branches. If a man remains in me and I in him, he will bear much fruit; apart from me you can do nothing.

  4. john 6:53Jesus said to them, “I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. 54Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up at the last day.

  5. Iโ€™m not sure why you are hung up on the second commandment, as if that saves you.

    it does save me.

    2cor7:10Godly sorrow brings repentance that leads to salvation and leaves no regret, but worldly sorrow brings death. 11See what this godly sorrow has produced in you: what earnestness, what eagerness to clear yourselves, what indignation, what alarm, what longing, what concern, what readiness to see justice done.

    living the love of christ of my neighbor and myself thru me, avails me to godly sorrow and repentence(that leaves no regret) that lead me to the salvation.

    it was knowing christ’s love that saved me. it is living that love that allows me to daily live that salvation, christ loving(love one another as i have loved you) myself and my neighbor.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Scott Fillmer

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading