Update (Disclaimer) 15 years later in 2025: This is an old post, written almost 15 years ago, but it links to another post which is of higher value to me, Are There Different Degrees of Sin? The Greater Sin of John 19:11 , so I chose to keep this post active. If you are coming here today, my posts now generally stay away from politics and almost completely concentrate on photography. For me this debate belongs in 2010 and I really have no interest in it today as I did back then.
Contrary to what the world says, views change and mature, and people do have the ability to evaluate their own heart. While I did write the post below in 2010, I would say looking back at my 2010 self, my heart has changed, in general, and a lot of what I wrote I would not write today (mainly because I loath politics and divisive topics now).
I have witnessed other people of faith be theologically correct while at the same time be very judgmental, harsh, and unloving, and that is not who I am or who I want to be today. Timothy calls for patience in 2 Timothy 4:2, and I think loving others through being very patient better describes what I write today.
2 Timothy 4:2 …be ready in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and exhort, with complete patience and teaching. (ESV)
The links below are almost all broken links now, but I have kept the links the way they were in 2010 just to preserve where they pointed at the time.
Original Text on Prop 8
California’s “Prop 8” proves that same-sex relationships are acceptable to Christians and compatible with scripture. Of course this is utter ridiculousness, but, that severely flawed logic seems to be what is prevailing in our culture today. This topic, which I usually just tend to leave alone, is overpowering the news, blogs, and culture lately (and is certainly nothing new under the sun, gay’s have been trying to justify their actions for millennia, see Why is Being Gay a Sin? for a civil discussion, Does Romans 1:26 Condemn Lesbians? for the absurd justification, and then an honest “Christian Perspective”, not forgetting to throw in Anne Rice who recently “quit” Christianity on Facebook [comments in pdf,] with Mark Driscoll’s response for the Washington Post, because she didn’t want to be “anti-gay anymore”, and the countless trash talk about Proposition 8 in California).
With Proposition 8 being overturned by the California courts, this seems destined for the Supreme Court (where they probably don’t want to deal with it either). The Boston Globe did a huge photo spread called Same Sex Marriage about a week ago and the responses to that article show why this, unfortunately, is THE topic of our day for Christians and the church. This discussion really wasn’t intended to launch into whether being gay is a sin or not, but to show the absurd arguments on both sides, which lack any careful thought.
This comment below is typical when reading trash talk on the news sites, and was made by someone who used the title “I Feel Drawn Towards Christianity, But I’m Gay”, which then received very complimentary responses, with little question for the lifestyle itself, or with sound argument for or against Christians and the homosexual lifestyle, and what scripture has to say about it’s effects and consequences.
I was surprised in a few ways, one by how openly acceptable the Christian responses were to this person. Not that they were accepting of the person, that’s great, but accepting of all aspects of the persons lifestyle, with not much need for contemplation (although some did suggest the person generically seek God’s direction). The other surprise was how utterly weak the reasoning and arguments were that were used on both sides.
I am certainly no expert on this topic whatsoever, and there are many who can soundly argue, on both sides, but those seem to be few and far between. No gay person I talk to (and many Christians for that matter) can give a sound theological argument, backed and based on scripture (since this person “feels drawn to Christianity”). The majority of the arguments put forth are emotional arguments, which are impossible to argue against in a rational manner. This is the argument that was given in this particular case:
The Bible also condemns divorce, the eating of pork and shrimp, and says that men shouldn’t sit on the same chairs as women who are menstruating.
The argument seems to lack even a surface level study of scripture, but most Christians responded with nothing other than an emotional response. As with much of Scripture in our culture today, these verses are taken so much out of context for the use of the argument for a homosexual lifestyle I am surprised they were made? I am not being mean or hateful in spirit here, but seriously, if you are gay, this is your argument?
- The Bible condemns the eating of pork.
- We eat pork today.
- Therefore, homosexuality is ok in the sight of the Lord.
There are so many things that could be addressed but at the basic level, in Mark 7:18-19 Jesus declared all foods to be clean, he didn’t declare all forms of sex to be clean. A better argument that perhaps shows a little more clearly why scripture says that the homosexual lifestyle is sinful in God’s eyes (and there are many things that are actually still seen as sinful in God’s eyes today, besides homosexuality), would be:
Point 1 on Sin:
- The Bible says sin is detestable in God’s eye’s.
- Therefore any continuous sinful act is not honoring to God.
Point 2 on Marriage:
- The Bible defines sex outside of marriage as sin.
- The Bible defines marriage as a monogamous union between a man and a woman.
- Therefore any nonrepentant sexual relationship of any kind outside marriage is sin in God’s eyes.
- Therefore a nonrepentant homosexual lifestyle is sin.
- Therefore a nonrepentant adulterous relationship is sin.
- Therefore any sexual relationship before marriage is sin.
I rarely see those “hateful” Christians everyone seems to refer to today that will acknowledge that the last three are equally sin, and equally condemned by scripture, but, that doesn’t mean that either is less or more acceptable to God as a way to live that honor’s God. I do not say that in a hateful manner but in an examination of scripture. I also recognize that many, or most, “gay Christians” will take issues with my argument above and defend it away in some manner. The statements above are all based on scripture and can all be backed theologically with sound argument.

Our culture as a whole is continually refusing to see objective truths in the Bible today. Whether we like to ignore them in our day or not, they still exist, there are still things that God says are good, and those things God says are bad, we just seem to have so much knowledge in everything that we have no knowledge in the actual truth anymore.




61 responses to “Examining Christianity’s Stance on Same-Sex Relationships”
22But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, 23gentleness
and self-control. Against such things there is no law.
I think we have already shown through proper exegesis that Galatians 5:22-23 is connected to a contrast of how not to live and the ramifications of living in the flesh.
could you please expand on this im not clear on what this statement means.
The warning in Romans 1 declares that God gave those men and women up (gave them up to their reprobate minds) who had decided to not use their bodies.
if homosexuality of itself is a sin then why the necessity of mentioning shameful lust?
there are a multitude of reasons that people have sex with one another, need to feel loved, low self esteem, self hatred, curiousity, loneliness, etc. lust compared to all the rest combined is a very small percentage.
if you are given over to the spirit of christ then your life is filled with the fruit of the holy spirit……yes or no?
the fruit of the spirit of christ is different from that of powers and principalities, the things of the flesh, and the world, because they are of a different spirit…. yes or no?
John,
Thanks for responding back. Let me explain Gal 5:22-23:
Paul was warning the Galatians, not only against the Judaizers (who claimed you needed to be circumcised and follow some of the Law to be saved), but he was also addressing those who though that they had “free liberty” in Christ to live as they pleased, even if it violated God’s “un”-conditional Law. Paul mentioned to the “Christians” in Galatia that they could not continue to live in sexual immorality, drunkenness, idolatry, and the like (v. 19-21) as free liberty in Christ, they were warned that living like that meant they would not inherit the kingdom of God. They were to live differently, by the fruit of the Spirit, “AND” as they belonged to Christ Jesus, having crucified the flesh “along with” its passions and desires (22-24). We have to take that entire passage as a whole, not separate; meaning, it is Galatians 5:16-24. So that we don’t confuse answers and questions, lets keep these separated, and I will try an answer your other questions in another post. If you still don’t see the connection between flesh/passion/sexual immorality vs. self-control, patience, faithfulness, then I will continue.
John,
Ok, now to answer Romans 1. I’m not really sure what you are getting at here: “who had decided to not use their bodies.” because they surely had no problem using their bodies, it was “how” they were using them. Men and women were utilizing their bodies contrary to how God intended their use to be. As Jesus claimed, โHave you not read that [God] created them from the beginning [and] made them male and female,and said, โTherefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one fleshโ?(Matt. 19:4-5). God intended Adam to be with Eve, sure you may say, for multiplication and population; but of course, because this was God’s intended purpose for humanity. Man is not required to marry, but if he is to marry, it must be according to God’s purpose. ANYTHING outside of holy marriage is fornication, period. So, even if a man is living with a woman and “seems” in love, or happy; its wrong.
I agree with you; people have sex for myriads of reasons, but unless Christ is number one, and the two are one in Christ (according to His intended purpose) then it is not love, but a deceived lust/desire.
The warning to the newly Christian gentile converts (Rome) where homosexuality was rampant and even accepted by the government officials, was wrong and God gave those people up to their own reprobate minds. But as I stated, if an alcoholic wants to justify his actions, by stating, “I was born this way, with genetics making me an alcoholic, I can’t change.” He is denying the power of God, or the cross he is to bear in life. he is saying that Christ is not all sufficient. He is also saying that the sin nature I was born with, is acceptable and right.
All of us were born with a sin nature, all. To conclude, God gave the people what wanted and what they “thought” was right. Proverbs 14:12, “There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way to death.”